Health data governance
In short
Health data governance is the set of rules, accountable bodies and procedures that decide who may use which health data, for what purposes and with what safeguards. It aims to let data serve care, research and health system management while protecting privacy. It combines legal and organizational decisions, not only technical ones.
- Type
- Practice
- Steward
- No single steward: general concept or generic technology
- Reviewed
- October 25, 2026
Explanation
What it is
There is no single definition. One international reference is the OECD Council Recommendation on Health Data Governance (OECD/LEGAL/0433), adopted on 13 December 2016. It recommends that governments establish and implement a national governance framework that encourages the availability and use of personal health data for health-related public interest purposes, while promoting the protection of privacy, personal health data and data security.
The OECD's twelve elements
- Engagement of a wide range of stakeholders, including public consultation.
- Co-ordination within government and cooperation among organisations, with common data elements and formats, quality assurance and interoperability standards.
- Review of the capacity of public sector health data systems.
- Clear information to individuals, including timely notification of breaches.
- Informed consent and appropriate alternatives.
- Review and approval procedures for uses of the data.
- Public transparency about purposes, approval criteria and implementation of the framework.
- Using technology to enable the use of the data while protecting privacy and facilitating individuals' control.
- Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.
- Training in privacy and security.
- Controls and safeguards: accountability, risk management, and technological, physical and organisational measures.
- Requiring organisations to demonstrate they meet national expectations, for example through certification or accreditation.
The Recommendation also calls for supporting cross-border cooperation and compatibility between countries' governance frameworks.
Primary and secondary use
Primary use is patient care; secondary use is research, statistics or management. Some frameworks set up authorities for secondary use: the European Health Data Space makes it conditional on a permit issued by a health data access body, and Finland has had Findata, which grants such permits, since 2019.
Not to be confused with interoperability governance
In the European Interoperability Framework, interoperability governance refers to decisions on frameworks, structures, roles, policies and agreements to ensure interoperability. Data governance answers a different question: who uses which data, for what and with what safeguards. In practice they support each other.
Common misconceptions
- Reducing it to data protection compliance. The OECD frames it as enabling public interest uses, not only as restricting them.
- Treating it as an IT topic. OECD elements such as engagement (1), review and approval procedures (6), transparency (7) and training (10) are not technical.
- Assuming consent is the only basis. The OECD expects alternatives and safeguards where processing is not based on consent.
- Leaving it for later. The OECD's 2022 Report to Council notes that many Adherents are still working toward implementation.
Usage examples
The OECD Recommendation on Health Data Governance (2016) sets twelve elements for national frameworks; the 2022 Report to the OECD Council assessed how Adherents are progressing.
In Finland, Findata, established in 2019 under the Act on the Secondary Use of Health and Social Data, grants secondary use permits and then compiles, combines and pre-processes the data.
The European Health Data Space (Regulation (EU) 2025/327) makes secondary use conditional on a permit from a health data access body and lets people opt out in a simple and reversible way.
In France, the Plateforme des données de santé (Health Data Hub) has the mission of guaranteeing unified, transparent and secure access to health data, and offers a starter kit for obtaining CNIL authorisation.
The Digital Public Infrastructure for Health report by Vital Wave with PATH and Digital Square (2023) describes Rwanda's governance, coordinated by the Ministry of Health's Chief Digital Officer with a Digital Health Committee and a technical working group.
Relation to other terms
Relies on1
- Consent managementStrong
The OECD Recommendation lists informed consent and its alternatives among the elements of every health data governance framework.
Depend on this one1
- Health interoperabilityMedium
PAHO recommends a national policy and governance framework to adopt standards and share data while protecting privacy.
Sources
- OECD — Recommendation of the Council on Health Data Governance (OECD/LEGAL/0433)legalinstruments.oecd.org
- European Commission — European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS)health.ec.europa.eu
- Findata — About Findatafindata.fi
- Health Data Hub — Plateforme des données de santéhealth-data-hub.fr
- European Commission — New European Interoperability Framework (2017)interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu
- Vital Wave, PATH and Digital Square — Digital Public Infrastructure for Health (2023)media.path.org

